| Highlights    In each of the past three years, the stock market began a slide  in the spring that lasted well into the summer months.  This week, we update the status of the 10 indicators we  identified that foreshadowed the 10-19% declines in recent  years.  On balance, the indicators do not yet point to a significant  risk of a repeat of the 10-19% spring slide this year. But a more  modest, 5-10% pullback is far from out of the question. 10 Indicators to Watch for a Spring Slide in the Stock  MarketOne year ago, we provided our list of the 10 indicators to watch  that seemed to precede the stock market declines in 2010 and 2011  and accurately warned of another spring slide in 2012. We again look to these indicators for signs of a potential  spring slide in the stock market this year. In early 2010, 2011, and 2012, run-ups in the stock market,  similar to this year, pushed stocks up about 10% for the year as  April began. Specifically, on April 23, 2010, April 29, 2011, and  April 2, 2012, the S&P 500 made peaks that were followed by  10-19% losses that were not recouped for more than five months.  This recurring phenomenon is often referred to by the old adage  "sell in May and go away." Now that it is around the time the prior  slides have begun, it is time to revisit the status of our  indicators. Currently, only two of the 10 indicators are waving a red flag,  while three are yellow for caution, and the other five are green.  On balance the indicators do not point to a significant risk of a  repeat of the 10-19% spring slides in the stock market this year.  However, a smaller decline of about 5% or so is far from out of the  question and remains our most likely scenario, as presented in  recent Weekly Market Commentaries. We will continue to  monitor these indicators closely in the coming weeks.   Fed stimulus-In 2010 and  2011, Federal Reserve (Fed) stimulus programs known as QE1 &  QE2 came to an end in the spring or summer, and stocks began to  slide until the next program was announced. Operation Twist was  announced on September 12, 2011 and was scheduled to conclude at  the end of June 2012, helping to prompt a market slide before it  was extended at the end of June 2012. This year, the current  program is unlikely to be slowed or stopped until much later this  year. Therefore, this is unlikely to be a driver of a slide in  stocks this spring.   Economic surprises- The Citigroup Economic  Surprise Index [Figure 1]measures how economic data fares compared  with economists' expectations and has marked the spring peaks in  both economic and market momentum in recent years. While the latest  readings have not surged up near the 50-level that marked the peaks  of recent years, the weakening trend does suggest expectations may  have become too high. Turning points typically have coincided with  a falling stock market relative to the safe haven of 10-year  Treasuries. 
   Consumer confidence- In the past few years,  early in the year the daily tracking of consumer confidence  measured by Rasmussen [Figure 2]rose to highs just before the stock  market collapse as the financial crisis erupted. The peak in  optimism gave way to a sell-off as buying faded. Investor net  purchases of domestic equity mutual funds began to plunge and  turned sharply negative in the following months. This measure of  confidence is once again beginning to fall from the highs. 
   Earnings revisions- The earnings estimates  moved higher heading into the first quarter earnings season of each  of the past few years, only to begin a decline that lasted the  remainder of the year as guidance disappointed analysts and  investors. This year, earnings expectations have not risen as much  as in prior years, which may limit the disappointment. In addition,  last week saw disappointing reports from bellwethers such as Oracle  and FedEx, among others. It is too early to say whether this  indicator is flashing a warning sign. We will be watching to see if  estimates begin to taper off. 
 The company names mentioned herein was for educational purposes  only and was not a recommendation to buy or sell that company nor  an endorsement for their product or service.   Yield curve - In general, the greater the  difference between the yield on the 2-year and the 10-year U.S.  Treasury notes, the more growth the market is pricing into the  economy. This yield spread, sometimes called the yield curve  because of how steep or flat it looks when the yield for each  maturity is plotted on a chart, peaked in February of 2010 and  2011, and March of 2012. Then the curve started to flatten,  suggesting a gradually increasing concern about the economy, as the  yield on the 10-year moved down. Although not as steep as in prior  years, this year we will be watching to see if the yield curve  flattens further after peaking in mid-March.   Energy prices -In 2010, 2011, and 2012, oil  prices rose about $15-20 from around the start of February, two  months before the stock market began to decline. This year, oil  prices rose to $98 at the start of February and have eased slightly  since then, suggesting less risk to consumers already struggling  with higher taxes. However, the national average retail gasoline  price has risen 50 cents this year, similar to the average rise  from the beginning of the year through March over the past three  years. With prices starting to ease along with crude oil the risk  is fading, but a further surge in prices at the pump would make  this indicator more worrisome.   The LPL Financial Current Conditions Index  (CCI) - In 2010 and 2011, our index of 10 real-time economic and  market conditions peaked around the 240-250 level in April and  began to fall by over 50 points. It may still be early, but this  year, the CCI recently reached 253-in line with the post-recession  highs with no signs yet of weakening.   The VIX - In each of the past three years the  VIX, an options-based measure of the forecast for volatility in the  stock market, fell to the low of the year in the low-to-mid teens  in April before ultimately spiking up over the summer. In recent  weeks, the VIX has declined once again to the lows of the year.  This suggests investors have again become complacent and risk being  surprised by a negative event or data. 
   Initial jobless claims - It was evident that  first-time filings for unemployment benefits had halted their  improvement by early April 2010, and beginning in early April 2011,  they deteriorated sharply. In 2012, April again led to  deterioration in initial jobless claims as they jumped by about  30,000. While claims have fallen to post-recession lows this year  as the labor market has improved, we will again be watching for a  move higher in April that would echo the spike seen in recent  years. (See this week's Weekly Economic Commentary for  what the Fed is watching in the labor market.)   Inflation expectations-The University of  Michigan consumer survey reflected a rise in inflation expectations  in March or April of the past three years. In fact, in 2011, the  one-year inflation outlook rose to 4.6% in both March and April  from 3% at the start of the year. This year, there has been almost  norise in inflation expectations, as they remain about 3.3%. Finally, one issue not addressed specifically in the indicators,  but important in the markets, is the surge in European  stresses-evident in the spring of each of the past few years. The  weakening economic data in Europe's core countries such as Germany  and France(seen most recently in last week's German manufacturing  and sentiment data), combined with financial stresses in peripheral  countries such as Cyprus pose a risk to global markets if too  little is done to address the key issues.Europe continues to focus  on capping banker bonuses and financial transactions taxes rather  than core issues. This could risk a bond market sell-off that could  negatively affect stocks here in the United States, similar to the  spring slides in recent years.
 While this list may seem incomplete, it is notable that many of  the most widely watched indicators of economic activitysuch as  manufacturing (the Institute for Supply Management Purchasing  Managers' Index known as the PMI or the ISM), job growth, and  retail sales, among others, did not deteriorate ahead of the market  decline, but along with it.It is not that they are not important;  it is just that they did not serve as useful warnings of the slide  to come, while the above indicators did. Shorter Slide? While it is possible we will experience another spring slide  this year, there are factors that may mitigate any decline short of  the 10-19% seen in the past few years. Looking back, in 2010 the negative environment that helped fuel  the decline included the uncertainty around the impact of the  Dodd-Frank legislation, the Eurozone debt problems and bailouts,  central bank rate hikes, and the end of the homebuyer tax credit.  In 2011, it was the Japan earthquake and nuclear disaster that  disrupted global supply chains and pulled Japan into a recession,  the Arab Spring erupted pushing up oil prices, the budget debacle  and related downgrade of U.S. Treasuries, rising inflation, and  central bank rate hikes that contributed to the decline. In 2012,  the Eurozone debt problems coming to a head, China's slowdown, the  European recession, the election uncertainty, and anticipation of  the 2013 budget bombshell of tax hikes and spending cuts weighed on  markets. Some of these challenges presented in prior years are repeated  again this year-potential for flare-ups over European problems and  the debt ceiling come to mind. However, there are some positives  this year that may help offset some of the negatives making for a  potential decline that may be less steep than those of recent  years. First, job growth finally appears to be reaccelerating with  three of the past four months posting more than 200,000 in net job  creation. Second, the housing rebound is now well-entrenched,  supporting economic activity and household confidence. Finally,  business spending growth appears to be reaccelerating and likely to  support manufacturing activity, which had fallen in May through  July of the past few years and contributed to the market  decline. Given this year's nearly double-digit gain in the S&P 500  and the possibility of another spring slide for the stock market,  investors may want to watch these indicators closely for signs of a  pullback despite the current upward momentum in the stock market  and solid economic growth.           IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES The opinions voiced in this material are for  general information only and are not intended to provide specific  advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which  investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial  advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical  and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged  and cannot be invested into directly. The economic forecasts set forth in the  presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no  guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful. The company names mentioned herein was for  educational purposes only and was not a recommendation to buy or  sell that company nor an endorsement for their product or  service. Stock and mutual fund investing involve  risk, including loss of principal. International and emerging markets investing  involves special risks, such as currency fluctuation and political  instability, and may not be suitable for all investors. The fast price swings in commodities and  currencies will result in significant volatility in an investor's  holdings. Bonds are subject to market and interest  rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values and yields will  decline as interest rates rise and bonds are subject to  availability and change in price. Government bonds and Treasury bills are  guaranteed by the U.S. government as to the timely payment of  principal and interest and, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate  of return and fixed principal value. However, the value of fund  shares is not guaranteed and will fluctuate. The Federal Open Market Committee action  known as Operation Twist began in 1961. The intent was to flatten  the yield curve in order to promote capital inflows and strengthen  the dollar. The Fed utilized open market operations to shorten the  maturity of public debt in the open market. The action has  subsequently been reexamined in isolation and found to have been  more effective than originally thought. As a result of this  reappraisal, similar action has been suggested as an alternative to  quantitative easing by central banks. Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary  value of all the finished goods and services produced within a  country's borders in a specific time period, though GDP is usually  calculated on an annual basis. It includes all of private and  public consumption, government outlays, investments and exports  less imports that occur within a defined territory. Quantitative easing is a government monetary  policy occasionally used to increase the money supply by buying  government securities or other securities from the market.  Quantitative easing increases the money supply by flooding  financial institutions with capital in an effort to promote  increased lending and liquidity. Operation Twist is the name given to a  Federal Reserve monetary policy operation that involves the  purchase and sale of bonds. "Operation Twist" describes a monetary  process where the Fed buys and sells short-term and long-term bonds  depending on their objective. Yield curve is a line that plots the  interest rates, at a set point in time, of bonds having equal  credit quality, but differing maturity dates. The most frequently  reported yield curve compares the three-month, two-year, five-year  and 30-year U.S. Treasury debt. This yield curve is used as a  benchmark for other debt in the market, such as mortgage rates or  bank lending rates. The curve is also used to predict changes in  economic output and growth. INDEX DESCRIPTIONS The Barclays U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Bond  Index includes all publicly issued, U.S. Treasury securities that  have a remaining maturity of between 7 and 10 years, are  non-convertible, are denominated in U.S. dollars, are rated (at  least Baa3 by Moody's Investors Service or BBB- by S&P), are  fixed rate, and have more than $250 million par outstanding. The  Index is weighted by the relative market value of all securities  meeting the Index criteria. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a  capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure  performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the  aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major  industries. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is an  unmanaged index, which cannot be invested into directly. Past  performance is no guarantee of future results. Citigroup Economic Surprise Index (CESI)  measures the variation in the gap between the expectations and the  real economic data. The VIX is a measure of the volatility  implied in the prices of options contracts for the S&P 500. It  is a market-based estimate of future volatility. When sentiment  reaches one extreme or the other, the market typically reverses  course. While this is not necessarily predictive it does measure  the current degree of fear present in the stock market. Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is an  indicator of the economic health of the manufacturing sector. The  PMI index is based on five major indicators: new orders, inventory  levels, production, supplier deliveries and the employment  environment. The Rasmussen Consumer Index and Investor  Indexes, measures the economic confidence of consumers on a daily  basis. The Rasmussen Consumer Index and Investor Indexes are  derived from nightly telephone surveys of 500 adults and reported  on a three-day rolling average basis. The baseline for the Index  was established at 100.0 in October 2001. The Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index (MCSI)  is a survey of consumer confidence conducted by the University of  Michigan. The MCSI uses telephone surveys to gather information on  consumer expectations regarding the overall economy. This research material has been prepared by  LPL Financial. To the extent you are receiving investment  advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor,  please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no  representation with respect to such entity. Tracking #1-153211 | Exp. 3/14 |