Search This Blog

January 29, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
January 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of January 28, 2013
  • Stock mutual funds have seen inflows each week so far this year, providing some evidence that investors are finally favoring stocks after years of selling. However, the details of the data reveal that the money is not going to U.S. stock funds and not coming from bonds.

  • A long-term rotation from bonds to stocks is likely to begin sometime this year, but those claiming that it is already underway are premature and may be in for disappointment if they expect the stock market rally to continue each week in the months ahead.

 

Still Waiting for the Bonds-to-Stocks Rotation

 

The S&P 500 Index closed above 1500 for the first time since 2007 on Friday, January 25, 2013, after rising for eight days in a row-the longest streak of daily gains since a nine-day run ended in 2004. Speculation has emerged that the long-awaited rotation by investors from bonds into stocks may finally have arrived and is powering the rally and, if so, that it has a long way to go. While we are also awaiting the rotation of investment flows from bonds into stocks, we think the latest speculation is premature and that the stock market rally may be due for a pause or a modest pullback.

Lipper, the fund flow tracking service, has reported inflows into stock mutual funds each week so far this year, providing some evidence that investors are finally favoring stocks after years of selling. However, the details of the data reveal that the money is not going to U.S. stock funds and not coming from bonds:

  • U.S. stock fund outflows. While U.S. stock mutual funds have seen inflows, during the past two weeks, the combined total of U.S. stock mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been outflows. While ETFs only account for about one-tenth of the assets in mutual funds, they often account for most of the weekly flows.
  • Bond fund inflows. At the same time, taxable bond funds and ETFs have seen inflows. 

The details of the data reveal that there is no evidence of a rotation from bonds into U.S. stocks, yet. The only rotation that appears to be taking place is out of money market funds into international stock funds, which continue to see steady inflows.

Another reason not to get overly excited about this development isinflows to U.S. stock mutual funds have been a good contrarian indicator for the stock market in recent years. For example, the last time U.S. stock mutual funds experienced a monthly inflow was April 2011-just as stocks peaked for that year on April 29, 2011 [Figure 1]. Prior to 2011, the inflow in April 2010 took place just before a stock market slide that began on April 23, 2010.


The inflows we have seen this year are likely part of the normal pattern of inflows in the early part of the year that have been followed by outflows during the rest of the year. The real test of investors' appetite for U.S. stocks will be later this year, as we see if the flows to U.S. stock mutual funds can buck the seasonal pattern that typically shifts to outflows.

Many individual investors consider the risk in investing to be the likelihood of suffering a loss during a quarter or a year, rather than the risk of missing longer term investment objectives. This is why they have shifted out of stocks and into bonds so consistently in recent years despite solid, but volatile, stock market performance. Investors have sought the perceived safety evident in the steady but relatively low return of bonds at the expense of potentially undershooting their long-term goals.

A long-term rotation from bonds to stocks is likely to begin sometime this year, as yields finally start to rise following a 30-year decline that boosted bond market total returns and pushed bond valuations to highs. High-quality bonds may begin to suffer losses, and the growing dividends per share coming from stocks become more attractive with stock market valuations near 20-year lows. However, those claiming that it is already underway are premature and may be in for disappointment if they expect the stock market rally to continue each week in the months ahead.

 

 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values and yields will decline as interest rates rise and bonds are subject to availability and change in price.

Municipal bonds are subject to availability, price, and to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values will decline as interest rate rise. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.

International and emerging market investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors.

Exchange-traded products (ETPs) are defined as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), exchange-traded notes (ETNs) and closed-end funds (CEFs).

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

Investing in mutual funds involves risk, including possible loss of principal. 

An investment in Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), structured as a mutual fund or unit investment trust, involves the risk of losing money and should considered as part of an overall program, not a complete investment program. An investment in ETFs involves additional risks: not diversified, the risks of price volatility, competitive industry pressure, international political and economic developments, possible trading halts, Index tracking error.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. You can obtain a prospectus from your financial representative. Read carefully before investing.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

 

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

 

LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

 

Tracking # 1-136686  |  Exp. 01/14

 

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

January 23, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
January 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of January 21, 2013

Highlights

  • This week's European finance ministers' meeting is a reminder that each spring for the past three years, U.S. stocks have started a slide of about 10% during the second quarter, led by events in Europe.
  • In 2012, the European fear gauge was the rise in southern European bond yields as the financial crisis worsened. In 2013, it is northern European bond yields falling as the economic crisis worsens.

Same Europe, Different Crisis

While fourth quarter 2012 earnings results will again garner attention this week, investors may also be looking overseas to gauge market direction, since this week holds the first meeting of the year for European finance ministers. It is worth remembering that each spring for the past three years, the S&P 500 has started a slide of about 10% during the second quarter, led by events in Europe.

However, this year may be different. In 2012, the European Union finally took two important steps to halt the financial aspect of its ongoing crisis.

  • One of those steps was the creation of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), a permanent rescue fund for countries in need of credit and unable to borrow in the market.

  • Another important measure was the authorization of Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), granting the European Central Bank (ECB) more power to intervene in the bond markets to assist countries in distress.

With these programs able to lend with few limits to banks and willing to buy bonds of any country that will accept the conditions, we do not expect market participants to fear a European financial crisis this spring and drive a 10% decline for U.S. stocks as they have in recent years. But Europe's crisis is far from over, and market participants may drive stocks lower later this year.

Europe has traded a financial crisis for an economic one.

Europe has traded a financial crisis for an economic one. The ECB is able and willing to only fight one crisis. The price Europe has paid to avoid a financial crisis is in the form of recession and unemployment rising above 10%-including France at 10.7%, Italy at 11.1%, Ireland at 14.7%, Portugal at 16.3%, and Spain at 26.2%. The Eurozone is mired in a recession that the ECB has little ability to mitigate. Inflation is still over the 2% target.

This is not just a shift in the crisis facing Europe's southern countries. It has now started to infect the core. In 2012, the economies of northern Europe, such as Germany, France, and Finland, were less negatively affected with economic growth and lower levels of unemployment more similar to that of the United States than the countries of southern Europe, including Italy, Spain, and Portugal. However, in 2013, the two largest economies of the Eurozone, Germany and France, will face low growth or even stagnation and rising unemployment.

The slowdown in northern Europe can make conditions in southern Europe worse by returning some risk of financial crisis. The economic slowdown in northern Europe may make these countries more reluctant to approve the release of aid packages to the southern countries. This is noteworthy, since if the Italian elections in February 2013 fail to produce a government that achieves political stability and applies economic reforms, the increased market pressure on Italy will likely require financial aid. Germany, the de facto decision maker as a result of making up the lion's share of any aid package, may already be averse to approve any more unpopular aid packages ahead of the German elections coming this fall. With the elections slowing the decision-making process in Germany, no fundamental changes in policy will likely be made before the elections that may avert the growing economic crisis.

In early 2012, the European fear gauge was the bond yield of southern European countries rising as the financial crisis worsened. But now that a financial crisis has been allayed, the decline in northern European bond yields is a sign of a worsening economic crisis. In a remarkable sign of how the European financial crisis has eased, Portugal's 10-year bond yield fell from 16% last summer to 6%, and Italian bond yields fell from 7.5% to under 5%. But at the same time, Germany's 10-year bond yield fell below 1.5%. This is not a sign of crisis averted, but of a different one brewing. Economists' estimates for Germany's gross domestic product (GDP) in 2013 are still coming down. Europe's 2012 auto sales fell -8.2% from the prior year, the biggest drop in 19 years.

 

 

Investors may be increasingly better off focusing on U.S. and emerging market stocks as the year matures and the European economic crisis deepens.

The investment consequences are that the bond yields of southern European countries may once again begin to rise, fall elections highlight the challenges putting pressure on stocks, and recession continues and ensnares more of the core nations of Europe. We may again see a stock market slide related to Europe's evolving crisis, but it may not be until the summer or fall that it appears this year rather than in the spring. After the powerful rise in European stocks since the financial crisis was averted last summer, investors may be increasingly better off focusing on U.S. and emerging market stocks as the year matures and the European economic crisis deepens.

 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

Stock investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.

International and emerging market investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values and yields will decline as interest rates rise and bonds are subject to availability and change in price.

There is no assurance that the techniques and strategies discussed are suitable for all investors or will yield positive outcomes. The purchase of certain securities may be required to effect some of the strategies. Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

Tracking # 1-134949 | Exp. 01/14

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

January 15, 2013

INDEPENDENT INVESTOR

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
INDEPENDENT INVESTOR
Timely Insights for Your Financial Future
January 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Independent Investor | January 2013

Naming Beneficiaries of Insurance Policies and Retirement Plans


One estate planning concern that is shared by people from all walks of life is who gets what when you pass on. While some individuals logically may assume that a last will and testament is the only official forum to express such decisions, that is not always the case. Often, an equally important issue is determining who to name as beneficiary on life insurance policies, employer-sponsored retirement plan accounts and IRAs, since beneficiaries of these assets are paid directly as named, regardless of what may be spelled out in a will.

Let's review some general transfer guidelines for these types of assets.

Life Insurance

No matter who is designated as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy, the individual(s) will receive the death benefit proceeds income tax free. Unlike property disposed of in a will, if the beneficiary designation form is properly completed, insurance proceeds do not go through probate.

For many married couples, a surviving spouse will be the most logical beneficiary. However, if it is determined that a spouse would not have the ability to manage a large sum of money, a trust may be a prudent beneficiary choice. The trustee (often a legal entity rather than an individual) would then take charge of managing, investing and disbursing the policy proceeds for the benefit of the surviving spouse.

Another important consideration is naming contingent or secondary beneficiaries. This means that if the primary beneficiary is no longer living, the insurance proceeds would go to another named individual or trust. If there are no surviving beneficiaries, then your beneficiary is generally the "estate of the insured," which means the death benefits end up being probated and ultimately distributed according to the instructions of the decedent's last will and testament. If an individual dies without a valid will (intestate), then the order of legal beneficiaries to whom assets are distributed is specified by state law.

Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs)

The law requires that a spouse be the primary beneficiary of a 401(k) or a profit-sharing account unless he/she waives that right in writing. A waiver may make sense in a second marriage if, for instance, a new spouse is already financially set or if children from a first marriage are more likely to need the money.

Single people can name whomever they choose as beneficiaries of retirement accounts, and nonspouse beneficiaries are now eligible for a tax-free transfer to an IRA.

Also, the IRS has issued regulations that dramatically simplify the way certain distributions affect IRA owners and their beneficiaries. Consult your tax advisor on how these rule changes may affect your situation.

Naming Children May Not Be Best

Because insurance companies, pension plans and retirement accounts may not pay death benefits to minors, when children are factored into the estate planning mix, a guardian, trust or trustee should be named beneficiary to ensure competent management of the proceeds. By naming a children's trust as a beneficiary, for example, the proceeds could be invested and managed by a competent trustee (a person or institution) you choose. A revocable living trust could also be named as a beneficiary, which would keep the proceeds out of probate.

 

To summarize, when naming beneficiaries, consider:

  • The ability of the beneficiary to manage assets. Perhaps a trust set up in the person's name would be better than a direct transfer.

  • Naming contingent beneficiaries. Should something happen to your primary beneficiary, the contingent beneficiary would receive your assets.

  • The age of the beneficiary. Many policies and plans will not directly transfer assets to minors until a trustee or guardian is approved by a court.

  • Employer-sponsored retirement plans. Unless waived by the spouse in writing, the law requires a spouse to be the primary beneficiary of the account.

Keep Your Plan Up-to-Date

After completing estate plans and wills, it is important to review and adjust beneficiary designations as needed to ensure that your estate plan accurately reflects your intentions. Remember, outdated beneficiary designations (e.g., ex-spouses) could misdirect the intended flow of an entire estate plan.

As is always the case with estate planning, consult with qualified professionals concerning your particular situation in order to ensure that your beneficiary designations are in tune with your goals.



This article was prepared by S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual. Please consult me if you have any questions
.


Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications or its sources, neither S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications nor its sources guarantees the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. In no event shall S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications be liable for any indirect, special, or consequential damages in connection with subscribers' or others' use of the content.

 

Tracking #: 1-128378

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC