Search This Blog

May 29, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
May 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of May 26, 2013

Highlights

  • A number of end-of-summer or beginning-of-fall events have the potential to lead to a change in the investment environment and alter the course of the markets.

  • How do you invest over the next few months leading up to these events-in other words, what investments do you rent for the summer?

  • Summer rentals for your portfolio may include: an overweight to U.S. stocks, high-quality bonds, and cash & hedges.

Summer Rentals

Memorial Day weekend kicks off the summer season in sunny destinations across the country as city dwellers and others seek to escape the heat and enjoy some natural beauty and relaxation. But like unwanted guests crowding a cabin or a cottage, a lot of unwelcome events that impact the markets can really ruin a summer vacation. So far, however, the calendar for investors appears clear of major events until the end of the summer and beginning of fall.

These end-of-summer/beginning-of-fall events include:

  • The Federal Reserve's (Fed) annual economic policy symposium in Jackson Hole, WY may reveal the next step in the Fed's bond-buying program.

  • Congress must address the debt ceiling and end of the Continuing Resolution funding the federal government, which could result in more tax increases and spending cuts.

  • The German elections will take place with implications for the path of growth and stability in Europe

These events have the potential to lead to a change in the investment environment and alter the course of the markets. But how do you invest over the next few months leading up to these events-in other words, what investments do you rent for the summer? Summer rentals for your portfolio may include:

  • Overweight U.S. Stocks - Soft global economic growth (See today's Weekly Economic Commentary for an update on global economic growth in 2013 and 2014) and a strong US dollar favors U.S. stocks over European stocks. Outside the United States, aggressive policy stimulus and improving economic data favor Japanese stocks. But it may be that after the German elections in September, the increased European fiscal policy flexibility-coupled with signs that Europe is beginning to emerge from recession-could favor buying European stocks and reducing U.S. stock exposure ahead of the debt ceiling battle looming in October.
  • High-Quality Bonds - While the Fed has two meetings this summer (June 19 and July 31), it is unlikely they will signal a major change until around late August. During the last three years, Fed Chairman Bernanke's speeches at Jackson Hole have been closely watched by investors for signs of changes in policy. Bernanke, whose second term as Chairman is up at the end of January 2014, has let it be known this year he will not be attending the Jackson Hole symposium, signaling changes in message and delivery may be taking place. Bond yields have already moved back up to the highs of the year as they adjusted to the Fed's message that when it comes to slowing bond purchases, it is only a question of when, not if. So it may not be until around the end of the summer that yields begin another move higher, leaving a little more time to rent high-quality bonds before dumping them for less interest rate-sensitive income-producing investments.

  • Cash & Hedges - Should stocks go from a gallop to a grind higher this summer, they run a risk of a 5-10% pullback along the way-especially since they have gone over 190 days without a 5% or more pullback, a record for this bull market. So it may make sense to rent a small position in cash, or another hedge in your portfolio, until a stock market pullback, then abandon that rental and buy stocks. Think of it as a little portfolio sunscreen to keep you from getting burned after the nearly 25% rally just since mid-November 2012.

While unscheduled events may arise and alter the investing environment this summer, it may be that the next major event is not until around the end of the summer. While it can be hard work and what may be perfect for you may not be right for someone else, finding your perfect summer rental can be well worth the effort.

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

International and emerging markets investing involves special risks, such as currency fluctuation and political instability, and may not be suitable for all investors.

Investing in foreign securities involves special additional risks. These risks include, but are not limited to, currency risk, political risk, and risk associated with varying accounting standards. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.

Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values and yields will decline as interest rates rise and bonds are subject to availability and change in price.

High-quality bonds are rated AAA and AA by credit rating agencies: An obligation rated 'AAA' has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong. An obligation rated 'AA' differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

 

Tracking # 1- 170790 | Exp. 5/14

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

May 20, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
May 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of May 20, 2013

Highlights

  • At the heart of it, all markets come down to buyers and sellers. U.S. stocks are being purchased by foreigners and corporations, while pensions and insiders remain net sellers. Demand from individuals and hedge funds has been mixed.
  • Risks to stocks would be a slowdown in corporate buybacks and a continuation of the slowing pace of net buying by foreigners.

  • On the other hand, fuel for the stock market could come from a re-allocation back toward stocks by pensions and individual investors.

Buyers & Sellers

We devote this commentary each week to assessing the many reasons markets may rise or fall. But at the heart of it, all markets come down to just one thing: buyers and sellers. Taking a look at who is buying and who is selling can tell us something about the durability of the market's performance and what may lie ahead.

Currently, there are six notable trends in buying and selling in the stock market. U.S. stocks are being purchased by corporations and foreigners. Demand from individuals and hedge funds has been mixed.Pensions and insiders remain net sellers.

Foreigners

Data released by the Treasury Department last week showed that the pace of net purchases of U.S. stocks by foreigners so far in 2013 has slowed sharply from the strong pace seen in late 2012 [Figure 2], led mainly by a waning of demand from European investors.

Net purchases quadrupled in 2012 over 2011's pace owing to two factors:

  1. The net selling that began in July 2011 and continued through year end after the debt ceiling debacle and downgrade in July and August; and

  2. The surge in buying of U.S. equities by Europeans that began in September 2012, as the European market momentum stalled after the run-up ahead of the widely anticipated announcement of its bond-buying program by the European Central Bank.

The weakest pace of net purchases of U.S. stocks by foreigners at the start to any year since 2004 sets 2013 on a disappointing pace. However, just as buying rebounded in 2012, we may see stronger demand from foreign buyers as confidence improves that U.S. fiscal challenges will not return the United States to recession as it has in Europe.

Hedge Funds

The U.S. Treasury tracks net purchases of U.S. stocks from investors in the Caribbean, which primarily represents demand by hedge funds. The net buying by hedge funds is negligible in 2013, as it was in 2012, with net buying in some months offset by net selling in others. Over the past three years, the monthly average has been a net sale of less than $1 billion of U.S. stocks, ranging from a net purchase of $5.2 billion to a net sale of $10.2 billion.

Companies

Companies themselves have been the biggest buyers of stocks. After reducing purchases during the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009 as companies were focused on hoarding their capital, corporations have returned to near-record levels of net share repurchases. New buyback announcements have surged this year [Figure 3]. Corporations have been aggressively buying back shares, adding up to hundreds of billions in purchases each quarter. Interestingly, the actual number of companies repurchasing shares has fallen as stock prices hit all-time highs, but the total amount spent continues to rise as the buying is concentrated among fewer, larger companies.


Corporations have become net buyers of shares as rising cash flow and wide profit margins compel them to shrink their share count to boostearnings per share as revenue growth slows.


Insiders

*In contrast to the buying they are directing their companies to undertake,insiders, or top executives of companies, have been net sellers of shares. While the pace of insider selling often slows during the "blackout" periods around the earnings season, recent data show that the number of shares of S&P 500 companies' insiders have sold relative to those that they have bought has soared. The main reason is that while selling has averaged a below average $2 billion per month this year, buying has been way below average and close to zero.
Should this net selling be seen as an important signal by those "in the know" of impending doom for corporate America? History offers a very different interpretation. Corporate insiders were buying in 2007 at the peak, and they were selling in 2009 as stocks were bottoming. Back in August of 2007, around the peak of the stock market, insiders at financial companies were doing the most buying in 12 years. At the time, this trend was interpreted by some as a buy signal for financials just before the companies in this sector saw their stocks fall more than 80%. Given this track record, we do not interpret the insider selling as a signal that they are acting on any inside information that would benefit an individual investor. Instead, we see it as another indicator of relative demand for stocks.

*Data gathered from Bloomberg reported SEC filings.

Institutions

Pension plans, both defined benefit and defined contribution, have been net sellers of stocks. The latest data from the Federal Reserve (Fed) show that through the end of 2012, pensions were selling stocks every year since the Great Recession began in 2008. Data for the first quarter of 2013 will be available in a few weeks, but it is unlikely that pensions have sharply turned around after years of relentless selling quarter after quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2012, although stocks were flat, the value of stocks in corporate retirement plans dropped $40 billion from the previous quarter. Pensions have been selling stocks to fund payouts and greater allocations to bonds [Figure 4]. Stocks now make up only about 53% of pension assets, down from a peak of about 70% before the financial crisis.

A recent survey by Pensions and Investments confirmed that the current asset allocation of major U.S. pension plans now has the lowest percentage of stocks held within investment portfolios over the past 30 years, and 14 percentage points below the average. This may mean that an increased allocation to equities may be coming. A reallocation of pension fund assets could be a long-term trend that would affect the investment landscape for many years.

Individuals

The power and influence of hedge funds is often discussed and used to explain movements in the markets. However, individual investors as a group wield far more buying power and influence over the marketplace. When individual investors make up their minds, they can be a powerful and durable force in the markets.

Individual investors have been sellers in recent years. It is notable that in 2012, investors in these funds sold more steadily and in a greater amount than they did during the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009. However, individual investors have been net buyers so far this year, measured by the net flows to mutual funds that invest in U.S. stocks. While we have seen buying take place in some of the first six months of recent years, the second half of the year has invariably seen outflows every month. We will have to see if the stronger pace of buying-much of which took place in January after a deal was reached on the fiscal cliff-and the potential renewed interest in stocks in 2013 can be sustained into the second half for the first time in six years [Figure 5].

It is possible that given the experience of the past decade, individual investors may be more cautious in their investing and allocate less to stocks than in the past. However, individual investors may also be saving more. Even if stock investments receive a smaller slice of the pie, the investing pie may be larger due to increased savings. Fortunately, individual investors do not need to wait for the return of better job growth or a rise in their incomes to invest more. In fact, investors have stashed trillions in cash into bank and money market accounts, according to Investment Company Institute (ICI) and Federal Reserve data.

Projecting the Trends

We expect foreigners and companies to continue to be net buyers while insiders remain sellers, and hedge funds will average to flat net buying in the coming quarters. Risks to stocks would be a slowdown in corporate buybacks and a continuation of the slowing pace of net buying by foreigners. On the other hand, fuel for the stock market could come from a re-allocation back toward stocks by pensions and individual investors.

The potential for money to flow into the stock market and lift stocks is significant. However, many investors must first become disillusioned with bonds. Since bonds have historically offered returns over the past 30 years that were competitive with stocks and provided much lower volatility, investors may continue to allocate their portfolios toward bonds as they seek to provide for a secure retirement. It may take a period of rising interest rates from near historic lows to demonstrate the potential for losses and volatility that bond investors throughout the 1970s experienced to reverse the money flows back to stocks.

Evidence of the power of these trends in buying and selling can be seen in the multi-year performance of the bond market (Barclays Aggregate Bond Index) where buying by all parties-pensions, individuals, foreigners, and the Fed-have pushed bond prices higher, and yields to record lows.






IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

International and emerging markets investing involves special risks, such as currency fluctuation and political instability, and may not be suitable for all investors.

Stock and Mutual Fund investing involves risks, including loss of principal.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values will decline as interest rates rise and bonds are subject to availability and change in price.

Earnings per share (EPS) is the portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. EPS serves as an indicator of a company's profitability. Earnings per share is generally considered to be the single most important variable in determining a share's price. It is also a major component used to calculate the price-to-earnings valuation ratio.

The Investment Company Institute (ICI) is the national association of U.S. investment companies, including mutual funds, closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Members of ICI manage total assets of $11.18 trillion and serve nearly 90 million shareholders.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index represents securities that are SEC-registered, taxable, and dollar denominated. The index covers the U.S. investment-grade fixed rate bond market, with index components for government and corporate securities, mortgage pass-through securities, and asset-backed securities.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

Tracking # 1- 168784 | Exp. 4/14

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

May 15, 2013

INDEPENDENT INVESTOR

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
INDEPENDENT INVESTOR
Timely Insights for Your Financial Future
May 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Independent Investor | May 2013

Home Refinancing Basics

In recent years, Americans seeking to capitalize on low interest rates have lined up to refinance their mortgages--often resulting in significantly lower monthly payments. While it's true that refinancing has the potential to help reduce the costs associated with borrowing money to own a home, it is not necessarily a strategy that makes sense for every individual in every situation. So before you make a commitment to refinance your mortgage, take some time to do your homework and determine whether such a move is the right one for you.

To Refinance or Not

The old and arbitrary rule of thumb said that refinancing only makes sense if you can lower your interest rate by at least two percentage points (e.g., from 7% to 5%). But what really matters is how long it will take you to break even and whether you plan to stay in your home that long. In other words, make sure you understand--and are comfortable with--the amount of time it will take for your overall savings to compensate for the cost of the refinancing.

Consider this: If you had a $200,000, 30-year mortgage with a 7.5% interest rate, your monthly payment would be $1,398. If you refinanced at 4.5%, your new monthly payment would be $1,013, a savings of $385 per month. Assuming that your new closing costs amounted to $2,000, it would take a little over five months to break even ($385 x 5.2 = $2,002). If you planned to stay in your home for at least five more months, then refinancing may make sense. If you planned to sell the house before then, you might not want to bother refinancing. (See table below for additional examples.)

All Mortgages Are Not Created Equal

Try to avoid the mistake of choosing a mortgage based only on its stated annual percentage rate (APR), because there are many other variables to consider, such as:

The term of the mortgage -- This is the amount of time (e.g., 15, 20, 30 years) it will take you to pay off the loan's principal and interest. Although shorter-term mortgages typically offer lower interest rates than long-term mortgages, they usually involve higher monthly payments. On the other hand, they can result in significantly reduced interest costs over time.


The variability of the interest rate
-- There are two basic types of mortgages: those with "fixed" (i.e., unchanging) interest rates and those with variable rates, which can change after a predetermined amount of time has passed, such as one year or five years. While an adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) usually offers a lower introductory rate than a fixed-rate mortgage with a comparable term, the ARM's rate could jump in the future if interest rates rise. If you plan to stay in your home for a long time, it may make sense to opt for the predictability and security of a fixed rate, whereas an ARM might make sense if you plan to sell before its rate is allowed to go up. Also, keep in mind that interest rates have hovered near historical lows in recent years and are more likely to increase than decrease over time.


Points -- Points (also known as "origination fees" or "discount fees") are fees that you pay to a lender or broker when you close the deal. While a "no cost" or "zero points" mortgage does not carry this up-front cost, it could prove to be more expensive if the lender charges a higher interest rate instead. So you'll need to determine whether the savings from a lower rate justify the added costs of paying points. (One point is equal to one percent of the loan's value.)

How Much Would You Save?

A homeowner with a 30-year, $200,000 mortgage charging 7.5% interest would pay $1,398 each month. The table below illustrates the potential monthly savings and the various break-even periods that would result from refinancing at different rates.

Rate After Refinancing

New Monthly Payment

Monthly Savings

Months to Break Even*

7.0%

$1,331

$67

30

6.5%

$1,264

$134

15

6.0%

$1,199

$199

10

5.5%

$1,136

$262

8

5.0%

$1,074

$324

6

4.5%

$1,013

$385

5

*Assumes $2,000 closing costs. Rounded up to the next month.

Stick With What You Know?

Finally, keep in mind that your current lender may make it easier and cheaper to refinance than another lender would. That's because your current lender is likely to have all of your important financial information on hand already, which reduces the time and resources necessary to process your application. But don't let that be your only consideration. To make a well-informed, confident decision you'll need to shop around, crunch the numbers and ask plenty of questions.


This article was prepared by S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual. Please consult me if you have any questions. LPL Financial Registered Representatives do not provide mortgage or lending services.


Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications or its sources, neither S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications nor its sources guarantees the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. In no event shall S&P Capital IQ Financial Communications be liable for any indirect, special, or consequential damages in connection with subscribers' or others' use of the content.

Tracking #: 1-162767

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC