Search This Blog

December 19, 2011

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
December 2011



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of December 19, 2011

Highlights

  • The purported end of the world falls exactly one year from this Wednesday, December 21, 2011. Like a primeval Y2K event, 2012-ers believe that one year from now the earth will experience a catastrophe or an enlightenment.
  • Surprisingly, we agree. The year 2012 will be one of transformation: politically, fiscally, and economically,with profound impacts for investors.

Apocalypse Soon

A search of the bestsellers with "2012" in their title does not offer the books you might expect such as travel guides, how to crack the SAT exam, or the best new cars to buy. Instead, the top books on the list are among the thousands of books, films, videos, seminars, and websites tied to doomsday predictions about 2012 (Table 1). In fact, the first non-end of the world entry to make the list does not show up until number 27 when the Dilbert calendar makes the list-then again, the Dilbert universe sure seems like purgatory. Specifically, according to these sources, the apocalypse comes on December 21, 2012-the purported end of the world falls exactly one year from this Wednesday.

 

 

Where does this 2012/end of the world stuff all come from? The Mayans, who spread across Central America from about 2000 B.C. to 900 A.D., used a unique Mesoamerican "long count" calendar that marked time in long cycles lasting 394.3 years calledb'ak'tun. A "sun", or era, may be defined as 13 b'ak'tun cycles. The Mayan creation date was in 3114 B.C. and the 13thb'ak'tuncycle will end next year-on December 12, 2012.

The 2012-ers have pulled together Mesoamerican archaeology, stories about extraterrestrials, New Age spirituality, and pseudo-scientific analysis to produce a prophecy that on December 21, 2012 a profound transformation will occur.Like a primeval Y2K event, they believe that one year from now the earth will experience a catastrophe or an enlightenment.
Surprisingly, we agree. The year 2012 will be one of transformation: economically, fiscally, and politically with profound impacts for investors.

  • The global economy is emerging. While we expect the U.S. economy to grow about 2% in 2012, the emerging markets will grow much faster. By the end of 2012, emerging market economies will reach 50% of the world's gross domestic product (GDP) (Chart 1). The non-advanced economies made up only 38% of global GDP 10 years ago, but reached 49% in 2011 (with currency adjusted for purchasing power parity), according to data from the International Monetary Fund.

  • We believe a mild recession emerges in Europe and the debt dilemma continues to grab headlines and move markets as will the outlook for growth and financial stress in China.

  • In addition, the party that emerges in control following the November 2012 elections in the United States will forge the decisions that will represent one of the biggest shifts in federal budget policy since World War II.

Consumer sentiment, business leaders, policymakers and geopolitics are going to have a significant impact on the investment environment in 2012. While volatility is likely to remain elevated, we do not see an end-of-the-world scenario for investors. In fact, the markets may fare better in 2012 than they did in 2011 with stocks posting solid gains (for deeper insight into our 2012 prophesies see our 2012 Outlook).
Works from the Mayans, prophesies of UFO cults, and even films from Hollywood (I Am Legend, Blade Runner, The Running Man) all suggest 2012 is likely to be fraught with danger. However, they also appear to feature flying cars-so it may not be all bad. Here is hoping that a transformational new era emerges in 2012 where politicians, business leaders, and individuals' interests align to produce an environment of respect and much needed action.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

The LPL Financial family of affiliated companies includes LPL Financial and UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc., each of which is a member of FINRA/SIPC.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Tracking #1-031262 | Exp. 12/12

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

 

This newsletter was created using Newsletter OnDemand, powered by McGraw-Hill Financial Communications.

December 15, 2011

INDEPENDENT INVESTOR

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
INDEPENDENT INVESTOR
Timely Insights for Your Financial Future
December 2011



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Independent Investor | December 2011

Tax-Efficient Asset Management--A Basis for Partnership With Your Heirs

As a framework for managing a personal investment portfolio, a family limited partnership (FLP) can provide many tangible benefits. An FLP treats the control of assets and the income they generate as separate items that can be assigned to different people. This can allow family members to share the administrative burdens and costs of portfolio management while focusing cash flow on one or two individuals. Also, by dividing the duties and benefits, you can set the stage for discounting the value of the assets in gift tax and estate tax accounting. This may create significant opportunities for tax management.

FLPs Defined

An FLP is a form of corporate ownership structure in which one or several stockholders serve as general partners who exercise management control over all investments held by the partnership. The remaining stockholders--the limited partners--are restricted to passive roles in investment management and control, even though the limited partners may receive the lion's share of any income produced by the assets in the FLP. Limited partners generally cannot sell or redeem their FLP shares without general partner approval. A limited partnership share may be discounted due to the lack of managerial authority over the underlying assets.

FLP structures may be used for virtually any asset--diversified stock and bond portfolios, real estate or shares in a family business, among others.

Variations on a Theme

One common FLP structure involves several family members pooling their personal assets and agreeing to put those assets under common management. In this scenario, the dominant contributor becomes the general partner and the minority contributors become the limited partners. There is no taxable gift event if the partnership units are directly proportional to the market values of each partner's individual contributions. However, if the limited partners are assigned units representing a disproportionate share of the pooled assets, there may be gift tax exposure for the excess. In that event, the value of the gift may be discounted due to the limited partners' lack of control over the underlying assets.

Another FLP structure involves a single contributor who places assets into an FLP, retaining a majority of the benefits of ownership but accepting only a limited partner's role in management. In this scenario, the general partner's authority is gifted with a small share of the partnership interest to an intended heir. The value of the partnership assets in the gift may be discounted because the general partner has only a small portion of the partnership equity and typically receives little direct financial benefit, even though the general partner directs dividend payments and investment policy.

A Liability Buffer

Any FLP structure creates a liability shield similar to other forms of corporate ownership. In general, financial claims against any business assets held in an FLP cannot be collected from the partners' personal assets. In addition, any personal liability claim against a partner typically cannot be extended to the FLP itself, although creditors may be able to seize that partner's share of any distributions or dividends. In some states, assets in an FLP may be insulated from claims in divorce proceedings.

Considerations for Creating and Managing an FLP

The most effective FLPs tend to be those created with valid business reasons--that is, with reasons other than simple tax management in mind. Such reasons may include a desire to set a framework for asset management and administration, or to create a financial apprenticeship structure for your children and other heirs. In addition, if you own significant investment property in another state, an FLP may eliminate the need for probate in that state as well as your home state.

Experts often remind partners in FLPs that their partnership should operate just as any other business corporation would--otherwise the partners could lose access to many of the tax and estate planning benefits that made the structure attractive in the first place. For example, the partners in an FLP should maintain a clear paper trail showing that they carried out all of the duties agreed to in the partnership's agreement, which is essentially the equivalent of a corporate charter and bylaws.

Putting appropriate financial management and control measures in place may prove to be vital to the viability of the FLP. For example, the FLP should have its own bank accounts to manage all income and expenditures related to FLP assets. And of course, while cash belonging to the partnership can be distributed, those distributions should be in the same proportions as the partnership interests. The IRS has challenged some FLPs and won by proving that general partners received excessive distributions and that the one-sidedness showed there had been no genuine transfer out of the estate. As with other business structures, an FLP should not be used to directly fund personal expenditures of any sort.

This article was prepared by McGraw-Hill Financial Communications and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual. Consult your financial advisor, or me, if you have any questions.

Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by McGraw-Hill Financial Communications or its sources, neither McGraw-Hill Financial Communications nor its sources guarantees the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. In no event shall McGraw-Hill Financial Communications be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damages in connection with subscribers' or others' use of the content.

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

 

This newsletter was created using Newsletter OnDemand, powered by McGraw-Hill Financial Communications.

December 12, 2011

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
December 2011



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of December 12, 2011

Highlights

  • The weaker pace of productivity in recent years could mean slower profit growth ahead for S&P 500 companies.

  • Fortunately, business spending on research and development (R&D) has improved, and patent grants are now on the rise. It typically takes about three years for patent grants to result in improved productivity for businesses.

  • We believe that productivity and innovation are due for a comeback, helping to support profit growth.

New Ideas Are Not Just for Europe

Developing new solutions to battle the debt problems in Europe has been important to making substantive progress toward a long-term solution. Last week's European summit produced progress in the form of a landmark agreement to strengthen budget rules. While the accord addresses the long-term problems facing Europe, the spending cuts are likely to slow growth and produce a mild European recession in 2012. The breakthrough finally opens the door for the European Central Bank (ECB) to intensify its efforts to stimulate growth and stabilize the debt markets beyond last week's rate cut.

 

While the headlines on Europe continue to garner nearly all of the market's attention, it is worth noting the changes in the trend of innovation since developing new solutions to drive productivity will be important to generating profits in the years ahead for the benefit of investors.

Developing new products and finding new, more productive ways to employ resources to create them is critical to sustaining the growth of a business. The ingredients for innovation are often in the form of patents, copyrights, and licenses to support economic interest in developing new technologies and processes. Competition intensifies companies' push for cost-saving productivity enhancements through implementation of new technologies and processes.

Post-World War II economic growth has averaged 3.2% on a real (net of inflation) basis annually. Most of this growth has come from increasing productivity rather than using more resources. Productivity growth, measured by industrial production per worker, has averaged 2.2% over the past 100 years. The only notable pauses in this trend were the result of the Great Depression and the inflation spiral of the 1970s,in the latter case,rapidly rising prices masked the benefits of improving efficiency.

New successful consumer products, such as smart phones and internet search engines, are often what come to mind when we think about innovation. It is the broad implementation of new technologies by businesses that accounts for many of the recent advances in productivity. A key component of rising productivity in the 1980s and 1990s was the implementation of just-in-time inventory management systems. The advent of radio frequency identification (RFID) tags allowed the trend to extend further. Putting RFID tags on products enables many types of companies to manage their inventory more efficiently through real-time integration with suppliers. Advanced asset tracking enhances operational efficiency. Supply chains can be optimized, thereby reducing the risk of input shortages without holding excess (and potentially perishable or obsolescent) critical supplies. This is especially valuable for health-care and manufacturing companies. For retailers there are additional benefits, such as the potential to eliminate the traditional checkout areas, reduced customer wait times, and improved theft detection. This is just one of the new technologies that help to drive productivity.

Productivity is critical to sustaining growth in profits. Over the long-term, S&P 500 company profits have risen by about 7% per year,on average. This rate also happens to be our forecast for profit growth in 2012 (for more details on earnings growth and other aspects of what we envision for 2012 see the 2012 Outlook publication). However, during the past decade, there has been a slowdown in productivity to less than half the historical trend rate.Weaker productivity could mean slower profit growth for S&P 500 companies in the years ahead.The reasons for declining productivity include: the slower pace of business spending, lower tolerance for risk-taking in corporate America, and the stall in patent grants.

One way to measure the potential pace of productivity and innovation in the coming years is to look at spending on research and development (R&D) and the growth in patent grants. Growth in spending in these areas tends to support ongoing productivity growth. After surging in the late 1990s amid the technology boom, business R&D spending as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) peaked in 2000. Patent grants soon began to fade and business productivity slumped starting in late 2004.

Fortunately, spending has since improved and patent grants are now on the rise. It typically takes about three years for patent grants to result in improved productivity for businesses [chart 2].

During the next 10 years, innovative business operations are essential for creating investor wealth. We believe productivity both in and outside the United States will rise in the coming years. Keeping up with the pace of change will be a challenge facing individual companies. The period of competitive advantage offered by a better mousetrap is shrinking. Faster development of products and services means companies must constantly innovate to stay on top. For instance, automobiles go from the design stage to production and the showroom floor in much less time than they did 10 years ago. Companies- and countries- must adapt or face extinction.

Technology and communications have made it cheaper and easier than ever before for someone with an idea to disseminate and develop it. Access to credit was severely curtailed during and after the financial crisis of 2008-09; however, credit and capital to finance new ideas have now become more abundant. And, while funding for the patent office had been in doubt as part of reducing overall spending, a November 2011 compromise secured funding through the end of the 2012 fiscal year. We believe that productivity and innovation are due for a comeback in the years ahead.

 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

The LPL Financial family of affiliated companies includes LPL Financial and UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc., each of which is a member of FINRA/SIPC.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Tracking #1-029589 | Exp. 12/12

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

 

This newsletter was created using Newsletter OnDemand, powered by McGraw-Hill Financial Communications.