Search This Blog

September 24, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
September 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of September 23, 2013

Highlights

After kicking the can on Syria, a new Fed chairman, and now tapering, the market is beginning to wonder if the government funding deadline and debt ceiling are the next cans to be kicked by those in Washington. This week, the headlines will focus on the possibility of a government shutdown and the debt ceiling impasse, perhaps setting up another buy-the-dip opportunity ahead of an 11th hour compromise.

The "Kick-the-Can" Pattern Keeps Giving to Investors in September

The Federal Reserve (Fed) "kicked the can" on tapering by unexpectedly postponing any reduction in the $85 billion pace of monthly bond buying at its policy meeting last week (see this week's Weekly Economic Commentary: Communication Breakdown). On Wednesday, the Fed said it needed more evidence of durable improvement in the economy and noted that a rise in interest rates threatened to slow the economy. Bond yields fell and stocks rallied, led by emerging markets (to understand why, see last week's Weekly Market Commentary: Emerging Markets and the Fed-What's Attractive and What to Avoid) and interest rate sensitive industries like housing stocks. The S&P 500 jumped to all-time highs on the news. By postponing tapering, the Fed added to the list of stock market-friendly actions to kick the can this month by those in Washington.

After kicking the can on neutralizing chemical weapons in Syria, a new Fed chairman with Bernanke's term expiring in just four months, and now tapering, there are key issues this week that are next in line. Market participants had expected concrete actions on the aforementioned issues in September, leading to relief when instead Washington kicked the can. Markets are beginning to price in the threat that Washington may not kick the can in the upcoming fiscal fights.

The euphoria in stocks seen on Wednesday gave way to selling on Thursday and Friday as investors' attention shifted to the looming budget issues: a continuing resolution (CR) to fund the government after the current fiscal year expires on September 30, and the debt ceiling, which will be hit in October. Worries increased on Friday when the Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed a CR to fund the government until December 15, but excluded funding for Obamacare -- making it unlikely to pass the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Until the end of last week, markets did little to price in any risk of a government shutdown despite the end-of-the-month deadline. This may be because the previous two government shutdowns were short-lived. The shutdown lasted five days in November 1995 and was followed by 21 days in January 1996. Neither episode was particularly negative for the stock market. However, that may have only been the case because they were not immediately followed by a debt ceiling fight that held much higher stakes for investors.

If Washington does not kick the can by the end of September and there is no 11th hour resolution to the CR, it may shake investors' confidence that the debt limit will be increased in mid-October. In contrast to the relatively mild consequences of government shutdowns, the debt ceiling has been a big threat to the stock market. In August 2011 when it came down to the wire on the debt ceiling, from July 7 to August 10, U.S. stocks (S&P 500) fell 17%. We have the makings of a stalemate again, given that this time there has been little pressure on Congress by investors to push up the debt ceiling, that it is the last chance seen by some House Republicans to defund Obamacare ahead of the October 1 open enrollment date, and that polls show voters more likely to blame Republicans than President Obama for any shutdown or breach of the debt limit.

That said, we expect Washington to kick that can again and form some compromise to fund the government and extend the debt ceiling. This week, the Senate may pass the House bill to fund the government through December 1 -- after stripping out the Obamacare provision -- and send it back to the House for an 11th hour vote. At the same time, the House Republicans may present a debt limit increase proposal that includes approval of the Keystone oil pipeline, a project that President Obama has been critical of and that is under State Department review. But at least it gets the discussions going.

This week, the headlines will focus on the possibility of a government shutdown and debt ceiling impasse, perhaps setting up another buy-the-dip opportunity ahead of an 11th hour compromise that kicks the can until later this year. The kick the can pattern has worked well this month for investors willing to buy the dips: an upcoming decision that leads to short-term volatility that is followed by kicking the can on the issue and a relief-driven rebound in the markets.

Volatility is not going away. After all, kicking the can does not resolve an issue-just postpones it. Actions to neutralize chemical weapons in Syria, selecting a new Fed chairman, the Fed's bond-buying program, and the fiscal challenges all are likely to be addressed this year. It is noteworthy that the December 15 cut-off date for government funding in the House-passed CR sets up yet another fiscal fight around the holidays, and is at about the same time as the Fed's December 17-18 meeting, when the central bank is increasingly likely to announce tapering.

With the markets welcoming kicking the can on issues of monetary and fiscal policy, Washington is likely to take the easy way out and continue to temporarily delay the tough decisions. We continue to recommend using any volatility as a potential buying opportunity. While these issues have the potential to induce some short-term volatility, they are unlikely to impact longer-term fundamentals of an improving global economic backdrop, rising indicators of revenue and profit growth, and stock market valuations that remain well below bull market peaks.

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal.

International and emerging market investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC or NCUA/NCUSIF Insured | No Bank or Credit Union Guarantee | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

Tracking #1-203797 (Exp. 09/14)

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

September 20, 2013

YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE
Insight into the Current Economic Climate and Ongoing Market Events
September 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Client Letter | The Powerful Message in Saying Nothing

Dear Valued Client,

Just three days following the fifth anniversary of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and the birth of the Financial Crisis, the Federal Reserve (Fed) remained firmly committed to keeping the full force of its easy monetary policy in place. On September 18, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Fed released its most anticipated statement of the year on monetary policy. But what was most profound was not what was said, but rather what was absent.

The market's strong consensus was that the Fed would announce a reduction in its $85 billion per month in bond purchases, a program referred to as quantitative easing or QE. The reduction in QE, more commonly referred to as tapering, was anticipated to start in September at $10 billion (the Fed reducing asset purchases from $85 to $75 billion) and accelerate until the program completely unwound sometime in mid-2014.

However, the Fed surprised the market by making no changes to its policy at all. Instead of Taper or even TaperLite, we got ZeroTaper.

The news sent risk assets strongly higher as the S&P 500 and the Dow finished the day at all-time highs. Bond prices, which were hurt by the fear of an impending Fed taper (and thus the start of its unwinding of its easy monetary policy), rallied significantly, as the 10-year Treasury yield fell from 2.88% to 2.69%.

So why did the Fed elect not to taper? Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke hinted at several reasons. First, the Fed is concerned about the fiscal battles in Congress over the continuing resolution to fund the government and increasing the debt ceiling, given that these events have been negative catalysts for the market and economy in recent years. In addition, the Fed worried that the U.S. economy is not accelerating fast enough and stands to grow at under 2% GDP (gross domestic product) rates, which is dangerously close to "stall" speed. Lastly, the rapid increase in bond yields, from as low as 1.6% in May 2013 to 3% a few days ago for 10-year US Treasuries, had the Fed concerned as these interest rates directly affect important consumer and business lending, including mortgage rates.

In a sense, by not tapering, the Fed "smacked" the wrist of the market for driving yields of longer-term bonds and thus interest rates so much higher, so quickly. Remember that the Fed directly controls short-term interest rates through its federal funds rate target, but the market establishes long-term rates through its assessment of future economic growth and inflation expectations. The Fed was disappointed in the way the market took its hint of a taper and extrapolated it into an imminent full-scale exit from its easy monetary policy. After all, the market had moved yields up almost 100% (1.6% to 3.0%) in just a few months. As such, the Fed wanted to make sure that it got the market's full attention and used the surprise "silence" of no taper to reinforce that the Fed will maintain its low interest rate policy for an extended period.

We see the Fed's decision to keep both feet on the easy monetary policy gas pedal as modestly bullish for equities, a risk to the dollar, and a platform to enable a small rebound for bonds. By forecasting inflation of 2% or less over the coming three years, the Fed signaled it may take longer than anticipated to ultimately raise rates or remove stimulus, both of which are bond-friendly over the intermediate term. This means the severe bond market sell-off we have experienced over the last few months is likely over for now, and that yields may hold in a relatively tight range for the remainder of the year.

Despite the dovish actions of the Fed, we do have to remain mindful that risks persist. The debt ceiling debate begins in earnest and Middle East geopolitical concerns continue. And while the Fed decided not to taper now, it signaled that tapering is just around the corner. Because a Bernanke-led Fed introduced QE policy in the first place, it does make some sense that the Fed also starts its path toward exiting it before Bernanke leaves office in January 2014, rather than leaving the lingering uncertainty for a new Fed leadership.  The end result is that the taper talk and market nervousness over it will re-emerge leading up to the next FOMC meetings in October and December.

The Fed was all bark and no bite by postponing a reduction in bond purchases and clearly showed concern over rising interest rates and the potential impact on the economy. The Fed has itself in a bit of a bind as it wants to signal a gradual exit from easy monetary policy, but market expectations and slowly improving economic conditions continue to warrant perhaps a faster unwind. But for at least one meeting, the Fed made clear its intention to do whatever it takes to keep rates low and the economy improving. And it did so with the most powerful tool of all…silence.

As always, if you have questions, I encourage you to contact me.




IMPORTANT INFORMATION

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult me prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in this letter may not develop as predicted.

Yield is the income return on an investment. This refers to the interest or dividends received from a security and is usually expressed annually as a percentage based on the investment's cost, its current market value or its face value.

Government bonds and Treasury bills are guaranteed by the U.S. government as to the timely payment of principal and interest and, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate of return and fixed principal value. However, the value of fund shares is not guaranteed and will fluctuate.

Treasuries are marketable, fixed-interest U.S. government debt securities. Treasury bonds make interest payments semi-annually, and the income that holders receive is only taxed at the federal level.

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country's borders in a specific time period, though GDP is usually calculated on an annual basis. It includes all of private and public consumption, government outlays, investments and exports less imports that occur within a defined territory.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you ar receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no

representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

Tracking #1-202988 | (Exp. 09/14)

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

September 17, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
September 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of September 16, 2013

Highlights

Nowhere have the effects of the Fed's message on tapering been felt more acutely than in the world's emerging markets. However, there are attractive countries and regions among emerging markets that may fare well through this transition to less global liquidity.

Emerging Markets and the Fed - What's Attractive and What to Avoid

While the Federal Reserve (Fed) could surprise investors this week, the Fed has been careful to communicate its intentions to the markets ahead of this week's meeting. Most market participants expect the Fed to announce a tapering in the monthly pace of its bond-buying program coupled with more guidance on when, in the distant future, it may raise rates. (See the Weekly Economic Commentary: Trustfrom 9/9/13 for details).

Nowhere have the effects of the Fed's message on tapering been felt more acutely than in the world's emerging markets (EM). The Fed's taper talk has put emerging markets under pressure. The MSCI Emerging Market Equity Index is down 4% for the year compared with a 20% gain for U.S. stocks based on the S&P 500. Much of that decline came following the Fed's May 22 communication on its intention to taper, with EM stocks falling about 15% over the following month. In addition, most EM currencies are depreciating as investors are pulling their money. The values of the currencies of Brazil, India, and Indonesia have fallen by about 10% over the past three months, echoing the start of the currency crises in Mexico in 1994 and Asia in 1997, which were devastating to emerging markets investors.

Echoes of a Crisis

Similar to the environment that preceded the July start of the 1997 Asian financial crisis, U.S. economic growth has prompted the Federal Reserve to reduce monetary stimulus. The Fed's tapering draws a comparison to the Fed rate hike of March 1997. In addition, the Japanese government has recently decided to raise the consumption tax from 5% to 8%, echoing a similar move they made in April 1997, when the tax was raised from 3% to the current 5%. These events have created headwinds for emerging market countries and acted as a weight on therelative performance of emerging market stocks versus U.S. stocks.

In the face of relatively sluggish global demand in recent years, many emerging market countries have relied on the extraordinary liquidity provided by the world's central banks to grow their economies, at the cost of running current account deficits as they increasingly borrow to import more than the export. But living on borrowed money has turned into living on borrowed time. Emerging economies have come under increasing pressure. As global credit conditions tighten and developed market bond yields rise, funding for widening current-account deficits becomes scarcer. Emerging market currencies are depreciating as investors find more attractive yields in more financially stable markets, as global liquidity is starting to be drained. In response, countries like India, Turkey, Indonesia, and others have seen their currencies and stock prices pummeled.

Avoiding Another Crisis

However, unlike in 1997, smaller deficits, larger foreign currency reserves, debt denominated in local currencies, and flexible exchange rates are positives likely to help avoid another emerging market crisis.

  • Smaller deficits- Compared to 1997, most emerging market economies are running only moderate deficits and the currency declines that have already taken place may be sufficient to shrink the deficits to sustainable levels.
  • Larger reserves- Focusingon Asia, where foreign currency reserves to cover imports have historically been skimpy, it is worth noting that many Asian emerging market countries now have doubled their foreign currency reserves relative to imports compared to 1997. These added reserves can help to protect a country from an outflow of funds.
  • Local currency debt- Most importantly, in 1997, the money borrowed by these governments was denominated in foreign currencies. Emerging market central banks spent much of their foreign currency reserves to support their currency. Ultimately, the currencies broke the peg and devalued companies and banks were unable to pay back the debt, resulting in defaults that had global consequences. This time, much of the debt is denominated in local currency, so the government can preserve foreign currency reserves for paying for imports and payments on foreign currency denominated debt.
  • Flexible currencies- In addition, the flexible exchange rates put the countries less at risk than when their currencies were pegged back in 1997. The decline in the exchange rates devalues the debt burden on the country. This greatly limits the damage from a falling currency.

Finally, it is important to note that these countries have not been on debt-fueled binges. Their growth has been below average, meaning potentially less of a growth bubble.

Dissecting Emerging Markets

Investors often tend to think of emerging market stocks as a homogenous asset class. But increasingly, emerging markets countries are showing their individual characteristics. While these countries may not experience a crisis like those of the 1990s, each country will feel the effects of reduced global liquidity differently-making some still worth avoiding and others potentially attractive.

The emerging markets most vulnerable are those with worsening current account deficits and those with excessive government budget deficits to fund. The most attractive countries have current account and budget balances or even surpluses. Dissecting the emerging markets asset class, we find some countries attractive and others that remain unattractive:

  • Unattractive: South Africa, Turkey, India, Peru, Chile, Colombia, and Indonesia.
  • Attractive: China, Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, and South Korea.

Emerging Opportunities

A dovish Fed could be a positive for emerging markets this week. But, longer term, with the taper largely priced in to bond yields(and any further upside in interest rates driven more by improving global economic growth), the outlook for emerging markets turns to prospects for growth. However, as the global economy improves and increases demand for emerging market goods, it will also prompt a reduction in global liquidity that may act as a drag on growth. This drag helps make broad emerging marketsstock exposure less attractive than U.S. stock exposure. However, there are attractive emerging market countries and regions that may fare well through this transition.





IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal.

International and emerging market investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors.

Currency Risk is a form of risk that arises from the change in price of one currency against another. Whenever investors or companies have assets or business operations across national borders, they face currency risk if their positions are not hedged.

Liquidity Risk is the risk stemming from the lack of marketability of an investment that cannot be bought or sold quickly enough to prevent or minimize a loss.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets.

Stock Exchange of Thailand Bangkok SET Index is a composite index which represents the price movement for all common stocks trading on the SET.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC or NCUA/NCUSIF Insured | No Bank or Credit Union Guarantee | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

Tracking #1-201712 (Exp. 09/14)

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC