Search This Blog

April 30, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
April 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of April 29, 2013

Highlights

  • In recent years, the spring slide in the stock market was driven by the arrival of a spring soft spot in the economy.

  • This soft spot has emerged again-for the fourth year in a row.

  • The bond and commodity markets have already responded negatively. Will the stock market also react as it has in the past?

Soft Spot Arrives on Schedule

There are certain things we have gotten used to counting on each spring: the season changes and the weather warms, baseball games bring fans to the stadiums, the economy weakens, and investors "sell in May and go away."

The old Wall Street adage "sell in May and go away" refers to the seasonal tendency of stocks' performance to weaken in the spring until the fall. In recent years, this spring slide in the stock market was driven by the arrival of a spring soft spot in the economy. This soft spot has emerged again-for the fourth year in a row. Will the stock market react as it has in the past? We think so.

The selling effect actually began in April of each of the past three years rather than waiting until May. In early 2010, 2011, and 2012, run-ups in the stock market, similar to this year, pushed stocks up about 10% for the year as April began. Specifically, on April 23, 2010, April 29, 2011, and April 2, 2012, the S&P 500 made peaks that were followed by 10-19% losses that were not recouped for more than five months.

In the United States, the first quarter of this year presented a modest bounce back from the fourth quarter's flat economic performance. However, the emerging trend in economic data both here and abroad suggests that the economy may once again be entering a soft spot as it did in the spring of each of the last three years:

  • Employment - Job growth in March was very disappointing. This week's April employment report may show that even for those with jobs, hours worked are shrinking in response to the sequester.

  • Manufacturing - Durable goods orders were weaker than expected in March 2013. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Index for March 2013 dropped to its lowest level since December 2012, and the flash report for April 2013 came in below expectations.

  • Retail sales - Retail sales fell in March 2013 and continue to decelerate on a year-over-year basis.

  • Foreign demand - The Eurozone recession is now well over a year old and is deepening and infecting the core northern countries like Germany and France. China's recent gross domestic product (GDP) for the first quarter of 2013 came in below expectations, as the pace of growth slowed from the fourth quarter of 2012, despite concerns of an overheated property market.

  • Corporate earnings - The earnings reporting season for the first quarter of 2013 has revealed that S&P 500 companies are mildly exceeding low estimates of 1-2% earnings per share growth through austerity (cost cutting), not with growth. Most companies are missing revenue growth expectations of just 1% year over year.

A good way to see this spring spot soft is by taking a look at the Citigroup Economic Surprise Index [Figure 1],which measures how economic data fares compared with economists' expectations and has marked the spring peaks in both economic and market momentum in recent years. The developing soft spot again suggests expectations may have become too high. The big swings in this index typically have either led or coincided with major moves in the stock market.

View Figure 1

While there are many similarities to the past few years' soft spots, as you can see in Figure 1, a difference that we noted in our spring slide indicators we published a month ago in the Weekly Market Commentary titled: 10 Indicators to Watch for a Spring Slide in the Stock Market, is that in 2010, 2011, and 2012, the soft spot materialized near the end of the Federal Reserve's (Fed) bond-buying programs: QE1, QE2, and Operation Twist. These Fed programs were later brought back or extended and the economy began to improve. This year, however, the current quantitative easing (QE) program is not expected to taper off until late this year at the earliest. While we note with a green flag that this is a positive for the economy and markets compared with prior years, a caveat is that the economy is slowing down even while QE continues unabated. If the market is looking for a boost to the pace of bond purchases, it may be disappointed. While not impossible, it would be very difficult for the Fed to expand QE beyond the current pace.

Side bar:A month ago, we provided our list of the 10 indicators that seemed to precede the 10-19% stock market declines in 2010, 2011, and 2012. An update of these indicators reveal mixed signs of a potential spring slide in the stock market this year, suggesting the potential for a declinethat may not be as severe as the 10-19% experienced in each of the past three years. Fed stimulusEnergy pricesInitial jobless claimsInflation expectationsYield curveLPL Financial Current Conditions IndexEconomic surprisesConsumer confidenceEarnings revisionsThe VIX

The bond market has reflected the soft spot with a decline in yields that began in mid-March 2013, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury having fallen from 2.06% to 1.66%. The commodities market, as measured by the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) as of 4/29/13, has also reacted to the slower growth trajectory with a sharp decline in prices, with copper down 8% and oil down 9% since March 27, 2013. Next, we will be watching closely if stocks join the other market and succumb to the soft spot as they have in the past.

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

International and emerging markets investing involves special risks, such as currency fluctuation and political instability, and may not be suitable for all investors.

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country's borders in a specific time period, though GDP is usually calculated on an annual basis. It includes all of private and public consumption, government outlays, investments and exports less imports that occur within a defined territory.

Quantitative easing is a government monetary policy occasionally used to increase the money supply by buying government securities or other securities from the market. Quantitative easing increases the money supply by flooding financial institutions with capital in an effort to promote increased lending and liquidity.

Operation Twist is the name given to a Federal Reserve monetary policy operation that involves the purchase and sale of bonds. "Operation Twist" describes a monetary process where the Fed buys and sells short-term and long-term bonds depending on their objective.

The VIX is a measure of the volatility implied in the prices of options contracts for the S&P 500. It is a market-based estimate of future volatility. When sentiment reaches one extreme or the other, the market typically reverses course. While this is not necessarily predictive it does measure the current degree of fear present in the stock market.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Citigroup Economic Surprise Index (CESI) measures the variation in the gap between the expectations and the real economic data.

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) index is based on surveys of more than 300 manufacturing firms by the Institute of Supply Management. The ISM Manufacturing Index monitors employment, production inventories, new orders, and supplier deliveries. A composite diffusion index is created that monitors conditions in national manufacturing based on the data from these surveys.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

Tracking # 1-162907 | Exp. 4/14

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

April 23, 2013

WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
April 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of April 22, 2013

Highlights

  • Last week, U.S. stocks suffered their worst drop in over nine months as a terrorist attack and poor economic and earnings data shook investor confidence.

  • Breaking down last week's market drivers may reveal insights about the likely future direction of the stock market.

Is Investor Complacency Finally Ending?

Last week, U.S. stocks suffered their worst drop since June 1, 2012, measured by a 2.1% loss-totaling 318 points-in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The week began with a terrorist attack that disrupted the Boston Marathon and a report that China's economic growth unexpectedly slowed in the first quarter of 2013. Throughout the week, first quarter 2013 earnings results, including widely watched companies such as Bank of America and IBM, missed analysts' expectations.

The U.S. stock market has risen for much of this year, despite the United States' fiscal failings, another European bailout, geopolitical threats, high energy prices, and weak global economic and earnings growth. So last week's notable drop may mark a departure. Breaking down last week's market drivers may reveal insights about the likely future direction of the stock market.

Terrorist Attacks

A major terrorist attack that disrupts economic activity and raises security fears is always a risk for the capital markets-especially considering that terrorist attacks of all types around the world now total over 4,000 per year, according to data compiled by the Institute for Economics and Peace.

The human toll is immeasurable. The impact of the terrorist attacks will stay in the hearts and minds of Americans long after any economic cost is recouped. With many thousands of terrorist attacks worldwide over the past 25 years, we have a lot of history to examine when looking at the economic or market impact of an attack.

Historically, major acts of terrorism have not had lasting long-term negative effects on financial markets. In the countries where these attacks have occurred, the stock market has fully recovered in one week, on average (excluding the 1990 London Stock Exchange bombing, when an unrelated recession emerged around the same time).

With the exception of the 9/11 attacks on the United States, there has never been a terrorist attack that has materially and negatively affected economic activity. The 9/11 attacks depressed economic activity for a very short period; however, the fourth quarter of 2001 marked the end of the recession, when economic activity re-accelerated from the third-quarter loss of 1.1% in real gross domestic product (GDP) with a fourth-quarter gain of 1.4%, followed by a 3.5% gain in the first quarter of 2002. The stock market responded similarly; within a week of reopening after the 9/11 attacks, the stock market was rallying-in the following nine weeks, the S&P 500 posted a gain of 20%.

Nevertheless, there is still the risk that, for the first time in history, a terrorist attack would result in a serious disruption of economic activity and cause substantial declines in the markets. If the attack remains a tragic-but isolated-event, it is unlikely to alter the market's direction. However, a series of follow-on attacks-the letters laced with the poisonous toxin ricin sent to the President and a U.S. Senator last week, for example-may erode confidence and negatively impact consumer spending, business investment, and investors' willingness to buy stocks, sending the market lower.

Data Sensitivity

In the past, stocks have had more significant reactions to changing economic fundamentals and geopolitical events rather than terror attacks. An example can be seen in the lengthy stock market decline that followed, but was unrelated to, the London Stock Exchange Bombing in 1990. The London Stock Exchange Bombing was followed two weeks later (August 2, 1990) by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and July 1990 marked the start of a recession in the United States.

What may be more important to market direction in the coming weeks is the increasing sensitivity of the stock market to disappointing data, as evidenced by thereaction on Monday, April 15, 2013 to China's GDP report. This resulted in a 1.8% stock market decline, which was driven primarily by disappointment in the report on first quarter economic growth in China that was released before the market opened and led to a decline that unfolded steadily throughout the day. Most of the decline had taken place by the time of the Boston Marathon terror attack at 2:50pm ET.

Economic data are increasingly falling short of expectations. The Citigroup Economic Surprise Index measures how economic data for the world's major economies fares compared with economists' expectations. In recent years, a slide in this index has corresponded to a slide in the performance of stocks relative to bonds. The index has peaked and made a steady decline in recent weeks, but only now may the stock market be beginning to react.

Disappointments came from companies, as well. While many companies are able to meet or beat the very low earnings growth expectations of about 1-2% for the first quarter of 2013 from a year ago, revenues have been weak. Of the 91 S&P 500 companies that reported revenues, more than half (56%) missed expectations, according to data tracked by Thomson Reuters.

Market participants may be getting increasingly sensitive to disappointing news after being complacent for some time. The VIX, the market's so-called "fear" gauge, jumped up and averaged 16 during the past week, after averaging a complacent 13.6 this year. While 16 is a far cry from the levels north of 25 seen during last spring's 10% stock market slide or even the 22 reached during November 2012's 7% pullback in the S&P 500, it is a sign investors are becoming increasingly wary of news or events that could prompt another decline.

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

International and emerging markets investing involves special risks, such as currency fluctuation and political instability, and may not be suitable for all investors.

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country's borders in a specific time period, though GDP is usually calculated on an annual basis. It includes all of private and public consumption, government outlays, investments and exports less imports that occur within a defined territory.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The Barclays Capital 7-10 Year U.S. Treasury Index includes all publicly issued, U.S. Treasury securities that have a remaining maturity from 7 up to (but not including) 10 years, are rated investment grade, and have $250 million or more of outstanding face value. In addition, the securities must be denominated in U.S. dollars and must be fixed rate and non convertible

Citigroup Economic Surprise Index (CESI) measures the variation in the gap between the expectations and the real economic data.

Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA): The Dow Jones Industrial Average Index is comprised of U.S.-listed stocks of companies that produce other (non-transportation and non-utility) goods and services. The Dow Jones Industrial Averages are maintained by editors of The Wall Street Journal. While the stock selection process is somewhat subjective, a stock typically is added only if the company has an excellent reputation, demonstrates sustained growth, is of interest to a large number of investors and accurately represents the market sectors covered by the average. The Dow Jones averages are unique in that they are price weighted; therefore their component weightings are affected only by changes in the stocks' prices.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

The VIX is a measure of the volatility implied in the prices of options contracts for the S&P 500. It is a market-based estimate of future volatility. When sentiment reaches one extreme or the other, the market typically reverses course. While this is not necessarily predictive it does measure the current degree of fear present in the stock market.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

Tracking # 1-160790 | Exp. 4/14

If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC

April 17, 2013

MONTHLY MARKET COMMENTARY

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here.
MONTHLY MARKET COMMENTARY
Update on Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Markets
April 2013



Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
Legacy Retirement Advisors
LPL Registered Principal
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.c
om
www.LegacyCentralCoast.c
om

CA Insurance Lic# 0B63553


Weekly Market Commentary | Week of April 15, 2013

Highlights

  • The dollar amount of first quarter 2013 earnings per share for the S&P 500 companies is expected to be lower than in each of the past three quarters and only 1% higher than a year ago.

  • With the price-to-earnings ratio rising above its long-term average, investors are getting more confident about future earnings growth.

 

First Quarter Earnings Insights

Four times a year, investors focus on the most fundamental driver of investment performance: earnings. Unfortunately, like the economy, earnings growth remains sluggish. The first quarter of 2013 is likely to mark the fourth quarter in a row of low to mid-single-digit earnings per share growth. The dollar amount of earnings per share for the S&P 500 companies is expected to be lower than in each of the past three quarters and only 1% higher than a year ago, according to the Wall Street analysts' consensus complied by Thomson/Reuters.

The sluggish growth rate for S&P 500 company earnings reflects not only slower growth among individual companies sales with revenues also expected to be up only 1% from a year ago, but also reflects the shrinking number of companies expected to post any growth in earnings at all, with four of the 10 sectors expected to reveal declines.

Manufacturing Profits

The ISM is one of the best leading indicators for the economy and markets. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) is a group that represents purchasing managers at U.S. corporations. The ISM surveys these purchasing managers each month and publishes the results in the form of an index. Although manufacturing businesses make up only about 40% of S&P 500 company earnings, demand for manufactured goods has been a timely barometer of business activity of all types.

Currently at about 51, the ISM suggests a sluggish environment for profit growth [Figure 1]. The level of the ISM index indicates that earnings growth may be slightly positive this quarter, but unless it picks up meaningfully-which seems unlikely given a soft U.S. consumer and the broadening recession in Europe among other challenges-profit growth is likely to be only half as strong as the consensus expects in coming quarters.

 

Looking Ahead

So far, 29 companies of the S&P 500 have reported earnings. This week, 74 companies are scheduled to report, with about half of the 500 companies due to report by the end of April. While investors are very focused on what the profits were for the past quarter, it is what they may turn out to be over the next several quarters that will likely have the most impact on the markets.

Much like last year at this time, estimates for earnings growth in the third and fourth quarter are in the double-digits. In contrast to those lofty expectations, last year earnings growth in the second half ended up averaging just 3%. Again this year, the estimates for the coming quarters are likely to come down as earnings remain bound by the sluggish economic growth driving revenues. Analysts' 10% third quarter 2013 and 13% fourth quarter 2013 year-over-year earnings growth expectations are out of sync with their much lower 3% revenue growth forecast for the second half. Given weak productivity growth and already wide profit margins, it is unlikely companies can produce double-digit earnings growth on low single-digit revenue growth later this year.

However, we may not see major downward revisions to earnings estimates in the coming weeks as first quarter reports come in. Despite being way too high last year, earnings growth expectations only came down about 1 percentage point during the first quarter earnings reporting season of last year. The likelihood of more gradual downward revisions to growth expectations is one of the reasons why we still believe another sharp 10-20% decline in the market-similar to those seen in the spring of each of the past three years-is unlikely. See our March 25 Weekly Market Commentary: 10 Indicators of a Spring Slide in the Stock Market for more insights on our view of the conditions needed for a major market decline.

What We Are Watching

Earnings may come in better or worse than expected for the quarter, depending primarily on factors that are hard to predict.

U.S. consumers have benefitted from a return to all-time highs in the stock market and the return to a strong housing market-these factors combined to result in strong consumer spending growth in the mid-2000s. On the other hand, the combined drags of higher taxes, high gasoline prices, sluggish job and income growth, and the overhang of more fiscal cliff battles to come may have weighed on spending. We will be watching to see how these drivers may have offset each other in the first quarter, especially relative to the high expectations for the consumer discretionary sector.

About 40% of S&P 500 corporate profits are derived from global sources. Asian economies experienced improving growth in the first quarter of 2013, while Europe's recession lingered. The extent to which these factors offset each other across different sectors will be worth noting since the trend may continue for much of this year.

Valuing Earnings

Investors are displaying the greatest confidence in continued earnings growth they have had in the past few years. This can be seen in the stock market rally lifting the price-to-earnings ratio, or what investors are willing to pay today per dollar of earnings over the past four quarters, to 15.3. This is now just above the long-term (since 1927) average of 15.1. The higher the price-to-earnings ratio, the brighter the implied outlook for future earnings growth.

While the rise in the price-to-earnings ratio to the long-term average suggests stocks can no longer be considered cheap, they are not expensive. Since WWII, every bull market has peaked with a price-to-earnings ratio of 17-18, with the exception of the late 1990s/early 2000 bull market that peaked at a much higher 28 [Figure 2]. From a valuation perspective, this suggests the S&P 500 could rise another 13% to 1800 without the benefit of any earnings growth before the stock market could be considered expensive and at significant risk of a bear market.

 

 

All that said, we would not be surprised at a modest stock market pullback of 5-10% as the earnings season offers us a reminder that although a fiscal crisis in the United States and Europe may have been averted in the first quarter, it did come with a cost in the form of growth.


 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

Stock and mutual fund investing involve risk, including loss of principal.

Because of their narrow focus, sector investing will be subject to greater volatility than investing more broadly across many sectors and companies.

The Consumer Discretionary Sector: Companies that tend to be the most sensitive to economic cycles. Its manufacturing segment includes automotive, household durable goods, textiles and apparel, and leisure equipment. The service segment includes hotels, restaurants and other leisure facilities, media production and services, consumer retailing and services, and education services.

The P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) is a measure of the price paid for a share relative to the annual net income or profit earned by the firm per share. It is a financial ratio used for valuation: a higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of net income, so the stock is more expensive compared to one with lower P/E ratio.

Earnings per share (EPS) is the portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. EPS serves as an indicator of a company's profitability. Earnings per share is generally considered to be the single most important variable in determining a share's price. It is also a major component used to calculate the price-to-earnings valuation ratio.

 

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is an indicator of the economic health of the manufacturing sector. The PMI index is based on five major indicators: new orders, inventory levels, production, supplier deliveries and the employment environment.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

 

Tracking #1-158904 | Exp. 3/14



If you no longer wish to receive this email communication, remove your name from this specific mailing list, or opt-out of all mailing lists.

We are committed to protecting your privacy. For more information on our privacy policy, please contact:

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff
565 8th St
Paso Robles, CA 93446

805-226-0445
Jennifer.Langstaff@LPL.com

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

Jennifer & Ryan Langstaff is a Registered Representative with and Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC